One hundred percent and still not enough?

- The islands are home to almost half the coral species in the Indian Ocean. Photo: NASA, Public Domain
There is no doubt about the high marine values of the area: pollution levels are low and biodiversity is healthy, a fact that will allow both research and natural dispersal processes to contribute to the re-establishment of coral reefs along the east coast of Africa, with immediate positive influences on the food supply of sub-Saharan Africa. Good things.
And the scientific and conservation components of the exercise have been supported by key institutions – PEW Environment Group, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, the Australian Institute of Marine Science and others.
Consultation was global; it is claimed that more than 275,000 people from more than 200 countries indicated full support for the protection of the 55 tiny islands and their surrounding waters.

- Increased marine fertility will help seabirds, like this Great Frigatebird, rear broods that have a better chance of surviving into adulthood. Photo: Duncan Wright, Public Domain
The big deal is the doubling of protected oceanic area. It now totals roughly 3.2% of the ocean’s area. While a 100% increase in anything good is not to be sneezed at, the harder reality is that if fully functioning ecosystems are the goal, a minimum of 30% protection by area is needed, and more is better. Leading marine scientists Sylvia Earle and Charlie Veron have described this increment as a “down payment” on what is expressly needed – a “marine ecosystems recovery plan.” Canada can help. Our protection of marine area is less than 1% of territorial waters. Let’s go Canada.











